Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Brown v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Jeff Nance
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Cothran v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2012de00392
Petitioner:
James Douglas Cothran
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-8118
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brown v. United States Marshal Service
as 2:2012cv00629
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Douglas Pendergrass v. Captain Brunson
as 12-7866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS ANTHONY PENDERGRASS
Defendant - Appellee:
T. BRUNSON, Captain, Florence County Detention Center
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Brown v. United States Marshal Service
as 2:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYLES v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE et al
as 1:2012cv01107
Petitioner:
HILDRED MANUEL LYLES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Internal Affairs Duty Inspectors and Inspector Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02012
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Brown v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2012cv01871
Plaintiff:
Jerome Julius Brown
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service and Paul Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
