Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,247
US v. Tony Murphy
as 23-6493
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: TONY JEROME MURPHY
MURPHY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00377
Petitioner: MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Murphy
as 7:2023cv00264
Plaintiff: Trinity Mateo Walker
Defendant: M. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bashir v. Holzapfel et al
as 5:2023ct03143
Plaintiff: El-Amin Bashir
Defendant: Warden William Holzapfel, Unit Manager Chanelle Newsom, Case Manager Gilbert Grimaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1475
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Cimbollek v. State of South Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv01805
Petitioner: Robert Murphy Cimbollek
Respondent: State of South Carolina, County of Union and Director of Union County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Brandi Murphy v. Jonathan Franklin
as 23-1462
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDI MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee: JONATHAN FRANKLIN
In re: Boris Murphy
as 23-167
Petitioner: In re: BORIS MURPHY
Zahar Bey v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff: Byron Zahar Bey
Defendant: Correen Johnson doing business as Department of Transportation, (BCPD) Jones, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Murphy v. Belton, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv01766
Plaintiff: Shane Murphy
Defendant: Belton, City of, Belton Police Department, City of, James Richey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?