Cases 1 - 10 of 790
Wilson v. McCall
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R. Wilson
Defendant:
Leonard McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. McCall
as 7:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Brian Turner
Defendant:
Matt McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Shanena McCall
as 24-4276
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHANENA INEZ MCCALL, a/k/a Chubbs
Bolton v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv02645
Plaintiff:
Thurston M. Bolton
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Nurse Supervisor, Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McCall v. The State
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Quinn McCall
Defendant:
The State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
McCall v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02041
Petitioner:
Dashawn Jewelin McCall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
