Cases 1 - 10 of 5,794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Marick et al v. Tsottles et al
as 8:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Debra Marick, Anthony Michael Marick, Aden Joseph Marick and others
Defendant:
Adam Tsottles, Envirosolutions Real Property Holdings, Inc. and Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Destined George v. Neeley
as 24-6524
Plaintiff:
DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE
Defendant:
SARGENT NEELEY, LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, LIEUTENANT FLEMING and others
Santiago-Espinosa et al v. S&M Harvesting, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Hernan Santiago-Espinosa, Ambrocio Sanjuan-Santiago and Rigoberto Sanjuan-Santiago
Defendant:
S&M Harvesting, LLC, Noe Santiago, Ita Cruz Mendoza and others
Blair v. Harris Teeter et al
as 3:2024cv03126
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Blair
Defendant:
Harris Teeter, North Carolina Industrial Commission, Ace American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 3:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Malcom Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
Office of George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 7:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Malcom Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Tina N. George
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
George v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Christopher S. George
Defendant:
Sergeant Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corliss v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2024cv02766
Plaintiff:
George F. Corliss
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
