Cases 1 - 10 of 3,306
Adames v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Alexander Adames
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marick et al v. Tsottles et al
as 8:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Debra Marick, Anthony Michael Marick, Aden Joseph Marick and others
Defendant:
Adam Tsottles, Envirosolutions Real Property Holdings, Inc. and Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Fogel v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brian Fogel
Defendant:
Major T. Hall, Warden Jeffrey Artrip, Assistant Warden J.H. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. White et al
as 1:2024cv03233
Plaintiff:
Michael David Graves, Jr.
Defendant:
Cathy White, Shanna Peeler, Officer Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Benny et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Javaun Johnson
Defendant:
A. Benny and Jason Christopher Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luma v. Dib Funding Inc, & Sunshine Capital, Inc
as 1:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Honson Luma
Defendant:
Dib Funding Inc, & Sunshine Capital, Inc
Petitioner:
Adam Petty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
