Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hernandez-Velasque v. Robeson County, et al
as 7:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Celsa Hernandez-Velasque
Defendant:
Johnson Britt, Ken Sealey, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00319
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC, Safway Group Holdings, LLC, Balfour Beatty Equipment, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOMAX et al v. KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00923
Plaintiff:
JONNIE LOMAX and HAROLD LOMAX
Defendant:
KRISPY KREME DOUGHNUTS, INC., TIM E BENTSEN, CHARLES A BLIXT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Thompson v. United States of America, The
as 2:2016cv02406
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Thompson et al v. United States of America, The
as 2:2016cv02357
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson and Kevin Singleton
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Thompson v. USA
as 4:2016cv00070
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Anthony Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thompson v. USA-2255
as 1:2016cv00147
Petitioner:
Anthony Thompson
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thompson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08297
Plaintiff:
Geneva Ellen Thompson and Stephen Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
