Cases 1 - 10 of 529
Matthews et al v. QBE Insurance Corporation
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
John Clinton Matthews, III and Carla Matthews
Defendant:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Gittens v. Archie
as 3:2024cv00817
Defendant:
Carla Archie
Plaintiff:
Jamaal A. Gittens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
El v. Archie et al
as 3:2024cv00617
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Carla N. Archie, Sally Snyder and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Young and My'Ka El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcurtis of the Family Robinson, Jr. v. West
as 5:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Alcurtis of the Family Robinson, Jr.
Defendant:
Carla West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLOUGHBY v. WEST
as 1:2024cv00662
Defendant:
CARLA WEST
Plaintiff:
ALJAMARIO WILLOUGHBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Amjad et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Carla Deem, Melinda Goff, Dr. Ayne Amjad and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton Steven Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Hensel et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Melinda Goff, James Hensel, III, Dr. James Beane and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Patel et al
as 2:2024cv00427
Defendant:
Dr. Patel, Dr. Nedelka and Dr. Frenkel
Plaintiff:
Carla Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jones v. Queen Anne's County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County, Maryland, Warden/Director Lamonte Cooke, Sgt. Daniel Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
