Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02838
Defendant: 3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
HAMBLEN v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2018cv00179
Plaintiff: DONNA HAMBLEN
Defendant: HAROLD EDWIN HAMBLEN, IRENE KATHERINE HAMBLEN, HERSHEL STANLEY HAMBLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Keyes v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02822
Plaintiff: Charles Wesley Keyes
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davenport et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2012cv00710
Plaintiff: Donald Davenport , Montague Agee , Michael Alston and others
Defendant: City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Clinkscales v. Walgreen Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv02290
Plaintiff: Charles Wesley Clinkscales
Defendant: Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Equitable Production Company v. Anderson et al
as 2:2009cv00289
Plaintiff: Equitable Production Company and Equitable Production Company
Defendant: Ronnie Anderson, Karen Anderson, Adam George Atkisson and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None
BAKER v. LEVI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00004
Petitioner: CHARLES WESLEY BAKER
Respondent: TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Diehl v. Benedict
as 1:2008cv01415
Plaintiff: Charles Wesley Diehl
Defendant: Ronald Lee Benedict
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones v. Beck et al
as 5:2007hc02130
Petitioner: Charles Wesley Jones, Jr.
Respondent: Theodis Beck and George Kenworthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?