Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wearen v. Meade et al
as 3:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Mrs. Barbara Meade and Cop D. Phil Grimes
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wearen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butcher v. Copping
as 2:2018cv00450
Plaintiff:
Samantha Butcher
Defendant:
Kelly A. Korkowski and Kelly A. Copping
Interested Party:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copping et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23053
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lynn Copping and Joseph Copping
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, C. R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. CH PUB, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00251
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , BEECHWOOD MUSIC CORPORATION , MJ PUBLISHING TRUST and others
Defendant:
CH PUB, LLC and WILLIAM D. MAGROGAN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Baker v. Greenville Mental Health Center et al
as 6:2012cv02871
Plaintiff:
Jacob Baker
Defendant:
Greenville Mental Health Center, Michael A Baker, Greenville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raiford v. FBI et al
as 1:2010cv02751
Plaintiff:
Kayla Lynn Raiford
Defendant:
FBI, ViCap, COP National Alerting System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01373
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cheryl Jones v. Vernon Beatty
as 09-1484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL J. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
VERNON D. BEATTY, BRENDA LYLES, CHIEF FISCHER and others
Robert Wardrick v. US
as 09-6561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JUNIOR WARDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES H. GREEN, Cop or Prosecutor, ALEXANDRA WILLIAM, Judge and others
Jones v. Beatty et al
as 7:2009cv00535
Plaintiff:
Cheryl J Jones
Defendant:
Vernon D Beatty, Brenda Lyles, FNU Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
