Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Taylor v. Comcast Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Taylor
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications Management LLC doing business as Xfinity Moble and CCS Companies, The doing business as Credit Collection Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hughes v. Allstate Financial et al
as 5:2021cv00554
Plaintiff:
Dianne M. Hughes
Defendant:
Allstate Financial and Credit Collection Services Commercial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01222
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Muhammad Abdul Qadir v. Latrell Wilson
as 20-1504
Defendant / Appellee:
LATRELL S. WILSON, ATTORNEY RAYMOND D. TURNER, ATTORNEY DAVID H. MAYBANK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD W.K. ABDUL QADIR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03453
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Qadir v. Wilson et al
as 4:2017cv02193
Plaintiff:
Muhammad W.K. Abdul Qadir
Defendant:
Latrell S. Wilson, Donald Martin, Roy Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNOWLIN v. CREDIT COLLECTIONS SERVICES
as 1:2017cv00727
Plaintiff:
HASSIE-DEMOND: KNOWLIN
Defendant:
CREDIT COLLECTIONS SERVICES and GEICO INDEMINITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
