Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Ray, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Richardson et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Shamonda Richardson and DAVID RICHARDSON,
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
David Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Garrett et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv00185
Plaintiff:
Roger Reid, Michael Garrett, Abewole Ojo and others
Defendant:
John Doe, 15, John Doe, 10, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews et al v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv03702
Plaintiff:
William Jones Andrews, Jr , Robert Arrington , Patrick Babb and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
US v. David Richardson
as 16-6660
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RICHARDSON, a/k/a Kerry Webber, a/k/a Dad, a/k/a Dakim
Richardson v. USA
as 4:2015cv00049
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richardson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv10604
Plaintiff:
Barbara Richardson and David Richardson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. David Richardson
as 13-4979
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RICHARDSON, a/k/a Kerry Webber, a/k/a Dad, a/k/a Dakim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
