Cases 1 - 10 of 3,801
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Royal II v. Central Maryland Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv01775
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Royal II
Defendant:
Central Maryland Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Whatley, II v. City of North Charleston
as 24-1559
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II, REV. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY and PACITA D. WHATLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON, NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, NORTH CHARLESTON CODE ENFORCEMENT and others
Samuel Whatley, II v. Bethany Phillips
as 24-1560
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II and REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY
Defendant:
BETHANY PHILLIPS, General Manager, U-HAUL, AMERCO and others
Carraway v. Fields et al
as 5:2024ct03153
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Carraway, II
Defendant:
Lt. R. Fields, Officer J. Lane, Sgt. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Neal, II
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lorence Smith, II v. Warden
as 24-6552
Petitioner:
LORENCE F. SMITH, II
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI Bennettsville
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6548
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., ESTATE OF CAROLYN BRYANT and FEDERAL JUDGE ELIZABETH MULLIGAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, FEDERAL JUDGE RICHARD E. MYERS, II, NEW HANOVER COUNTY NC SUPERIOR COURT and others
Carter v. Hively
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter
Defendant:
Herbert L. Hively, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Warden of Livesay Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv03331
Plaintiff:
James Henry Thompson, II
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
