Cases 1 - 10 of 15
James Cole v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv01274
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
James Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gregory v. Wallens Ridge State Prison
as 7:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
James Cole Gregory
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. McCall
as 1:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Case Mgr. McCall
Plaintiff:
James Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gregory v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2020cv00932
Petitioner:
James Cole Gregory
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cole v. QBE Specialty Insurance Company Inc
as 2:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
James Cole
Defendant:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cole et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30299
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A. Cole and James Cole
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arkalgud Lakshminarasimha v. James Cole
as 14-1005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARKALGUD N. LAKSHMINARASIMHA
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES COLE, both individually and in his official capacity as Dep AG, MATTHEW FESAK, both individually and in his official capacity as AUSA, ROY COOPER, both individually and in his official capacity as NC AG and others
Cole et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv22199
Plaintiff:
Edith Cole and James Cole
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
