Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rose v. Jefferson
as 2:2023cv02132
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Deadra L. Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
James Rose, Jr. v. Randy Demory
as 23-6309
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDY DEMORY, Director Hill-Finklea Detention Center
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, HONORABLE D. L. JEFFERSON and SHERIFF DUANE LEWIS
Venero et al v. Prince George's County Maryland et al
as 8:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
Denise Venero, Sophia Venero and Stephany Venero
Defendant:
Prince George's County Maryland, Edward L. Jefferson, Terri LittleJohn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
James Rose, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 22-6218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, HILL-FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rose v. State of South Carolina et al
as 2:2021cv02909
Plaintiff:
James Edward Rose, Jr
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Hill-Finklea Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02685
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, CR Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Sheri L Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
James v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2011cv01646
Plaintiff:
Anthony James
Defendant:
Deadra L Jefferson, Jon Ozmint, Lisa A Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
