Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elmore et al v. Blake, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Samantha Mae Elmore and Robert William Elmore
Defendant:
Judge Blake, Jr. and Megan Maynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maynor Castro-Mendoza v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2054
Petitioner:
MAYNOR RAMON CASTRO-MENDOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Samuel Edward Hiott et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01345
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Edward Hiott, Rick Burnell Hanson, Dominick LaRocca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Lewis v. Maynor
as 1:2023cv00034
Petitioner:
Brian Kevin Lewis
Respondent:
Timothy Maynor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dickson v. Kahn et al
as 1:2022cv01222
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Lawrence E. Kahn, Jill S. Polk, Aaron Poindexter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Simpson v. Maynor
as 5:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Anthony George Simpson
Respondent:
Timothy D. Maynor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Maynor
as 5:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Simpson
Defendant:
Timothy D. Maynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Maynor et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Simpson
Defendant:
FNU Maynor and April Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
