Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Foster v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, et al
as 1:2024cv00715
Defendant:
Yes Care Client Services, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, Corizon Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ernest Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Roush v. Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2020cv00436
Plaintiff:
Austin D Roush
Defendant:
Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail Authority, Nurse 2, Nurse 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Barbee v. Major Anderson
as 20-6437
Defendant / Appellee:
C. MORGAN, LPN, W. COLLINS, Correctional Officer, J. L. THOMPSON, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS BARBEE
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Nurse (2) and SGT. JOHN DOE
Audrel Watson, Jr. v. G. Bowle
as 15-7536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREL JACK WATSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
G. BOWLES, Dr., Dentist, MS. MORELLE, Dental Assistant, UNKNOWN NURSE, #1 and others
Audrel Watson, Jr. v. G. Bowle
as 15-7075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREL JACK WATSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
G. BOWLES, Dr., Dentist, MS. MORELLE, Dental Assistant, UNKNOWN NURSE, #1 and others
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director Virginia Dept. of Corrections, WARDEN WRIGHT, Warden-Lawrenceville Corrections Center, MS. HIGHTOWER, Director of Nursing and others
FIORE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2015cv00051
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH FIORE, II
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, UNKNOWN MEDICAL NURSE #1, UNKNOWN MEDICAL NURSE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2014cv01315
Plaintiff:
Audrel Jack Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Warden Wright, Ms. Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Anderson, The County of et al
as 6:2009cv02368
Plaintiff:
Jerry White
Defendant:
Anderson, The County of, Anderson County Detention Center, Garry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
