Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
OVERMAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00549
Petitioner:
WAYNE SPRY OVERMAN, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Daniel Felix v. Doug Doughtie
as 21-1740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL FELIX, Homeless Cats of Hatteras Island, NC, Non-Property Animals of Hatteras Island, NC
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DOUGHTIE, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity, DONAVAN RUTH, DARE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
OVERMAN v. STOKES & FOLKS et al
as 1:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
BRIAN OVERMAN
Defendant:
CLYDE P. STOKES and STOKES & FOLKS doing business as DOMINO'S PIZZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Felix v. Doughtie et al
as 2:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Doug Doughtie, Rob Ross, Dare County, North Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Felix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Churray et al
as 4:2020cv00244
Defendant:
L Harris, Nfn Early, Kathy Wyant and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremiah Overman v. Dr. Wang
as 19-6013
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. MARK AMONETTE and DR. WANG, Physician for GROC Crr. Center
Defendant:
MELVIN DAVIS, Warden GROC Crr. Center, GREEN ROCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER and MRS. MASENBERG, Grievance Coordinator for GROC Crr. Center
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMIAH W. OVERMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Overman v. Wang et al
as 1:2017cv01465
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Overman
Defendant:
Lawrence Wang and Mark Ammonette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
