Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Rochester v. Lee et al
as 6:2020cv00245
Defendant:
A R Lee, P B Wickensimer, R L Blume and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B. et al v. Smith et al
as 8:2018cv01780
Plaintiff:
C. B. , E. B. and P. B.
Defendant:
Jack R. Smith and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. P-B Health Home Care Agency, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02329
Plaintiff:
Artisha G Williams
Defendant:
P-B Health Home Care Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
P.B. v. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2012cv00334
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.B and M.B.
Plaintiff:
P. B.
Defendant:
Michael Andrew Alexander, Linda Bradshaw, Burke County Public Schools Board of Education and others
Petitioner:
Guardian Ad Litem Peggy M. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Black v. BB&T Bank et al
as 5:2012mc00034
Plaintiff:
John D. Black
Defendant:
BB&T Bank, N P B C Bank, AARP Life Insurance and others
William Brown v. Sydney Lackey
as 11-7269
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
SYDNEY JEROME LACKEY, Vice Narcotics Detective, CHARLIE T. DAVIS, Vice Narcotics Detective, LUKE J. DONAHUE, Vice Narcotic Police and others
Brown v. Lackey et al
as 3:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
William Arthur Brown
Respondent:
Sydney Jerome Lackey, Charlie T. Davis, Luke J. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
