Cases 1 - 10 of 11
R. E. et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00591
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
P. K. E. and R. E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hong v. P K Contractors, Inc,. et al.
as 1:2019cv00607
Plaintiff:
Sun Ha Hong
Defendant:
P K Contractors, Inc. and Yun Hong Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAHATHA v. GOULD et al
as 1:2018cv00698
Defendant:
ROWAN CLERK OF COURT, B. C. BENFIELD, RICHARD D. LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff:
CORY ANTOINE MAHATHA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cranston v. Chanthaxoth et al
as 5:2017cv01014
Plaintiff:
Shaun Cranston
Defendant:
Vilaphong Chanthaxoth and P&K Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REID v. CAPT et al
as 1:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
CALEB REID
Defendant:
CAPT, PRICE, P. K. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
P&K Mines, LLC v. Penna
as 2:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
P&K Mines, LLC
Defendant:
Fern Penna
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Danny Conway v. Nancy Rouse
as 10-6996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY CONWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY ROUSE, J. MICHAEL STOUFFEL, J. DIEHL and others
Conway v. Rouse et al
as 1:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
Danny Conway
Defendant:
Nancy Rouse, J. Michael Stouffel, J. Diehl and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Powell v. American Air Liquide Corp. et al
as 4:2008cv03260
Defendant:
American Eagle Accessories Group, 3M Company, International Paper Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert N. Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conte's Bike Shop, Inc. et al v. Pagona et al
as 2:2008cv00467
Plaintiff:
Conte's Bike Shop, Inc., Conte's Bike Shop, Inc., Conte's Bike Shop, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Penny Jo Pagona and P & K Ventures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
