Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Mullinax et al v. Griffin et al
as 0:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mullinax and Tammy Beason
Defendant:
Michael Griffin, Daniel Taggart, Gary Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Walton v. Pence et al
as 2:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Janae'-E: Walton
Defendant:
Julie A. Pence, Lera K. Vanmeter, Cathy S. Gatson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jack Vigue v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD H. PENCE, Counselor, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK RAY VIGUE
Thompson v. Executive Branch of the United States Government et al
as 5:2020ct03294
Defendant:
Mike R. Pence, Executive Office of the President, State of North Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E.V. Drake v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 20-1913
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST TEXAS BRIDGE, INC., SASHA MORENO, JOANNA BREYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC V. DRAKE, a/k/a E. V. Drake
Vigue v. Clarke et al
as 3:2020cv00505
Defendant:
Richard H. Pence, Mr. Sink, Brian J. Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Ray Vigue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Trump
as 20-6934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE PENCE, DONALD J. TRUMP and MITCH MCCONNELL
John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Trump
as 20-6907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE PENCE, DONALD J. TRUMP and MITCH MCCONNELL
John Demos, Jr. v. Mitch McConnell
as 20-6845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, MITCH MCCONNELL, U.S. Senate Majority Leader and MIKE PENCE, Vice President of the United States
Demos v. Trump et al
as 2:2020cv00366
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Mike Pence and Donald J. Trump
Plaintiff:
John R. Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
