Cases 1 - 9 of 9
William Layton v. Carter
as 24-6110
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAYTON
Defendant:
CARTER, a/k/a Jane Doe, Medical Administrator and IRA REINER, a/k/a Jane Doe, LPN, Physician for SISP
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Layton v. Carter et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Defendant:
Carter, LPN Reiner and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
William Layton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fogle v. Brooks et al
as 1:2023cv00256
Defendant:
Brooks, LPN Reiner, Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Fogle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Reiner v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv20404
Plaintiff:
Melissa Diane Reiner
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reiner et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17219
Plaintiff:
Judith Reiner and Donald Reiner, II
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garris v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Garris and Garris Family Members
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Elijah Cummings, Harry Spikes, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
