Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rowles v. Shambarger Service, Inc.
as 1:2021cv02181
Plaintiff:
Tomas Rowles
Defendant:
Shambarger Service, Inc. and Jonathan Shambarger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rowls v. United States of America
as 0:2021cv00992
Plaintiff:
Eric Rayonn Rowls
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowls v. Mackelburg
as 0:2020cv00979
Petitioner:
Eric Rayonn Rowls
Respondent:
W.E. Mackelburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rowls v. Joyner
as 0:2018cv01933
Respondent:
H. Joyner
Petitioner:
Eric R. Rowls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rowls v. Mansukhani
as 0:2016cv00246
Petitioner:
Eric R Rowls
Respondent:
Andrew Mansukhani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sacra et al v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv16265
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sacra , Jennifer Sacra , Jayce Rowles and others
Defendant:
Jackson Hewitt, Inc. , K.R. Enterprises, Inc. , Jeremy W. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ohio Security Insurance Company v. K R Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv16264
Plaintiff:
Ohio Security Insurance Company
Defendant:
K R Enterprises, Inc. , Jeremy Evans, Leonard Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wallace v. Chapman et al
as 1:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
Harry Lenzy Wallace
Defendant:
Michael Chapman, Ricky Frye, Jeffrey Ebersole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2010cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pauline Rowl v. Smith Debnam Narron Wyche Sain
as 09-1701
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAULINE ROWL
Defendant - Appellee:
SMITH DEBNAM NARRON WYCHE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP, KIRSCHBAUM NANNEY KEENAN & GRIFFIN PA, MONOGRAM CREDIT CARD BANK OF GEORGIA, a/k/a GE Financial Corporation, a/k/a GE Money Bank, a/k/a General Electric Capital Corporation, a/k/a General Electric Company, a/k/a General Electric Capital Services, Incorporated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
