Cases 1 - 10 of 43
TOWN OF SILER CITY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00365
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TOWN OF SILER CITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ASHAD-MAURICE v. MULLINAX et al
as 1:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
SILER EL ASHAD-MAURICE
Defendant:
RICHARD BLAKE MULLINAX and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wolfe et al
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Johnson
Defendant:
R.M. Wolfe, H. Berryman and K. Siler-Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. Capt. Covington
as 21-7438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPT. COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR., KATY POOLE and others
Kilgore v. Sipe et al
as 1:2021cv00026
Defendant:
J. T. Sipe, Edwin C. Roessler, Jr. and C. Siler-Taylor
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00195
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
