Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wiles v. Grossman et al
as 1:2021cv00774
Petitioner:
STEVEN A. GROSSMAN, BLACK & BOONE, P.A. and Lucas T. Baker
Respondent:
JOHN LEE WILES
WILES v. GROSSMAN et al
as 1:2021mc00033
Petitioner:
STEVEN A. GROSSMAN, BLACK & BOONE, P.A. and Lucas T. Baker
Respondent:
JOHN LEE WILES
Holloway v. Walrath et al
as 3:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Y. White, Mr. Maurice and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv23324
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Baker and Randy T. Baker
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Patton et al
as 1:2014cv02136
Plaintiff:
Terrance T Baker
Defendant:
Larry Ray Patton, Jr and Jonathan Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31865
Plaintiff:
Ruby T. Baker
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SunTrust Mortgage Incorporated v. Donald Busby, Jr.
as 11-1469
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD D. BUSBY, JR., ROBERT G. RONK and KENNARD DAVIS
Defendant:
LORI A. NASSIDA, KELLY M. BAKER, MICHAEL T. BAKER and others
Movant:
JOHN J. PAVEY, JR. and PAVEY & SMITH, P.A.
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. v. Baker et al
as 2:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. and Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Kelly M Baker and Michael T Baker
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Capital Crossing Bank v. Baker et al
as 1:2008cv00714
Plaintiff:
Capital Crossing Bank and Capital Crossing Bank
Defendant:
Steven T Baker and Cynthia R. Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beck Imports Limited Partnership v. Aaron T. Baker
as 3:2007cv00012
Plaintiff:
Beck Imports Limited Partnership
Defendant:
Aaron T. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Property Damage (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
