Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Tamar Harvey v. Ralph Coleman
as 23-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH R. COLEMAN, Lieutenant, TIMOTHY W. GREEN, Unit Manager of Housing Unit 6, M.A. BAILEY, Senior Warden and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT HOBBS, SERGEANT WOODBURY, E. CLAY, AD Food Service Manager and others
Green v. Procu Life Ins. Co.
as 9:2021cv04178
Plaintiff:
Mary W Green
Defendant:
Procu Life Ins. Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green v. Baxter et al
as 5:2021cv00907
Defendant:
Jerry Adger, Karen Walto, Thomas Hallam and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Greene v. National Rural Electric Cooperative Association et al
as 1:2018cv00295
Defendant:
National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Disability Management Services, Inc., Rutherford Electric Membership Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Anderson II v. Green et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
William L. Anderson II
Defendant:
Timothy W. Green, Cynthia P. Putney and Ms. Tapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Fredericka W. Greene
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carl Greene v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 15-2500
Petitioner:
CARL W. GREENE
Respondent:
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
Thomas Everette, Jr. v. Regina Peele
as 14-7660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EVERETTE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
REGINA W. PEELE, CREDITED SOLUTIONS, KIM D. SAUNDER and others
Green et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv25682
Plaintiff:
Linda Green and Arnold W. Green
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Germain v. Watson et al
as 1:2014cv02383
Plaintiff:
Jean Germain
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Bruce W. Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
