Cases 1 - 10 of 1,112
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI and NICOLE R. RAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Jones v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 24-1398
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DAVID JONES
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, The Honorable, Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense, Defense Contract Management Agency, DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY and DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Taylor et al v. EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ralph Taylor and Lloyd Baker
Defendant:
EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC and Tug Hill Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Lloyd v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 1:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Talon Andrew Lloyd
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
