Cases 151 - 160 of 832,219
AVINT, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
AVINT, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Madovar Packaging Inc. v. IPMedia Holdings Inc d/b/a GildedBox
as 1:2024cv05545
Plaintiff:
Madovar Packaging Inc.
Defendant:
IPMedia Holdings Inc d/b/a GildedBox
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
Melanie Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Paula S. Gordy LISW, LLC v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 0:2024cv02377
Plaintiff:
Paula S. Gordy LISW, LLC
Defendant:
Change Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Zhengxu He v. Seritage Growth Properties et al
as 1:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Zhengxu He
Defendant:
Seritage Growth Properties, Andrea Olshan and John Garilli
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Howard v. Access Transcripts LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard
Defendant:
Access Transcripts LLC and Abbey Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Mississippi Tank and Manufacturing Company
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miller
Defendant:
Mississippi Tank and Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Finnegan v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Defendant:
George P Sherman, Adrienne L Meiring and Indiana State of
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Thigpen et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Miller
Defendant:
Deputy Xavier Thigpen and Jones County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
