Cases 31 - 40 of 156
Stanton v. Tunica County School District et al
as 3:2020cv00013
Defendant:
Tunica County School District and Dr. Margie Pulley
Plaintiff:
Charlette Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STANTON v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00388
Plaintiff:
HOWARD STANTON
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Stanton v. Goss et al
as 1:2019cv00837
Plaintiff:
Tony Stanton
Defendant:
Gary Smith, GSS, John or Jane Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suzanne Stanton v. Clay Heiberg, et al
as 19-40896
Defendant / Appellee:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C., COUNTY OF COLLIN, TEXAS, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUZANNE M. STANTON
Stanton et al v. White et al
as 3:2019cv00733
Defendant:
Big M Transportation, Inc., Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon, John David White and others
Plaintiff:
David Stanton and Amanda Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Luke Stanton, Sr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-40774
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUKE ADAM STANTON, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Stanton v. Ekeke et al
as 1:2019cv00379
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr
Defendant:
V McMullen, April Clark, Stephanie A Lute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Staton et al
as 2:2019cv11568
Defendant:
XYZ Insurance Company, Logan Stanton, Logan Staton and others
Plaintiff:
Harry S. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Shulkin et al
as 1:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Bryan Matthews, U.S. Attorney General, Lowell Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Dietrich Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stanton v. Woodard et al
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
V McMullen, Wayne E Brewer, Lance C Knod and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
