Cases 111 - 120 of 827,870
Boswell v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01255
Petitioner:
Avery S Boswell
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mozingo v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mozingo
Defendant:
Dana Sullivan, Brian Sullivan, Laundry Capitan Jesus Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osmanski v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02846
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter Osmanski
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ryhter et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Shelli Ryhter and Jerry Ryhter, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schwartz v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02830
Plaintiff:
Laura Schwartz
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02834
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stewart
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08102
Plaintiff:
Rosita George
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Mosley v. Dancy et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mosley
Defendant:
Austin Dancy, Wellpath LLC, Laconya Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
J. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
