Cases 111 - 120 of 831,710
Inoa v. Dziduch
as 24-1711
Plaintiff:
JOSE INOA
Defendant:
L.T. DZIDUCH, L.T. ENSER, L.T. DELANEY and others
In Re: Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, et al, et al
as 24-2167
Petitioner:
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Respondent:
GLENDA JOHNSON, JOHN MARSHALL, CAROLYN SAMPSON and others
Singh Singh v. Garland
as 24-60328
Petitioner:
Gurpreet Singh Singh
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Bibb v. U.S. Dist. Court Judge Edmund Sargus Jr.'s Court
as 24-3561
Plaintiff:
RONALD DWAYNE BIBB
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., COURT
Heritage Const. Companies, LLC, et al v. Philip Keithahn, et al
as 24-2333
Plaintiff:
Selective Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Heritage Construction Companies, LLC, JAC & Sons Investments, Andrew P. Christensen and others
Cross Defendant:
Philip Keithahn, Minnesota Medical University, LLC and John Does, 1 through 10
Daniel Wilson v. Shane Jones, et al
as 24-2327
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Defendant:
Shane Jones, Sheriff, Pope County, Roddy Sweet, Jail Admin., Pope County Detention Center, Cunningham, Sergeant, Pope County Detention Center and others
Clark v. Garland, et al
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
ERIC S. CLARK
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General, in both his official and individual capacities, (FNU) (LNU), unknown Government Agent #1, in individual capacity, (FNU) (LNU), Unknown Government Agent #2, in individual capacity and others
Midwest Ozone Group v. EPA, et al
as 24-1223
Petitioner:
Midwest Ozone Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
PARKINSON v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00110
Petitioner:
BRADLEY PARKINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
