Cases 91 - 100 of 3,532
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ashley et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ann Ashley, Katelyn Phillips, Deannia Keith and others
Defendant:
Coltan Jones, Sheriff Michael Reagon and Fentress County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6851 Disclosure of Intimate Images
Phillips v. Unknown Party #1
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Phillips
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Strada et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Tareynton Reshard Rogers
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Shawn Phillips and Joshua Kays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00763
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Respondent:
Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Lee Malone
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Jacobs v. Marion Correctional Institution, et al
as 24-3092
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Defendant:
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY and others
Wilson v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
James Wilson
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
