Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Michael Amble, et al v. Knox County, TN
as 20-5839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HICKS, JESSICA MORGAN, MICHAEL AMBLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KNOX COUNTY, TENNESSEE and KNOX COUNTY, TN
Johnson v. Christiansen
as 4:2020cv11461
Defendant:
John Christiansen
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Johnson v. Joseph Smith
as 20-5505
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH SMITH
Debtor:
In re: DAVID JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JOHNSON
Bailey et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv13442
Defendant:
Karri Ousterhout, Lloyd Rapelje, David Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Krystal Clark, Paula Bailey and Hope Zentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00222
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Modern Holdings, LLC, et al v Corning Incorporated, et al
as 5:2019cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Caldwell, Clyde Simpson, Steven Coffman and others
Defendant:
City of Danville Kentucky, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Amble et al v. Spangler et al
as 3:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
curtis lane, alonzo hoskins, robert thomas and others
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, Knox County, TN, Bernie Lyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kozusko et al v Tire Discounters, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Kozusko , David Johnson , Scott A. Mustovich and others
Defendant:
Tire Discounters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00415
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miller v. Stewart et al
as 2:2017cv12506
Plaintiff:
Estate of Kayla Renea Miller
Defendant:
Anthony Stewart, Heidi E Washington, Bruce Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
