Cases 11 - 20 of 219
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. USA
as 5:2023cv00292
Petitioner:
Eyron J. Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
National Court Reporters, Inc. v. Langston et al
as 1:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
National Court Reporters, Inc.
Defendant:
Lee F. Langston, Cory J. Smith and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Harris et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2023cv01290
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris, Jacob Blake, Bianca Austin and others
Defendant:
City of Akron, Police Chief Stephen L. Mylett, Mayor Daniel Horrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv02213
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Jerry Baker
Defendant:
Douglas Wilson and YRC Inc. doing business as YRC Freight and Roadway Express
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Florence J. Smith, Sugar Long, Thelma Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bobby Smith v. Goostrey, et al
as 23-1025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY J. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTING INSPECTOR GOOSTREY, INSPECTOR JOHNSON, ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN T. PAGE and others
Gibson v. Durfey et al
as 2:2022cv03792
Plaintiff:
Klain Gibson
Defendant:
Officer M. Durfey, Officer J. Smith, Officer E. Fain and others
Interested Party:
ip state of ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith #482352 v. Goostrey et al
as 1:2022cv00753
Plaintiff:
Bobby J. Smith #482352
Defendant:
Unknown Goostrey, Unknown Johnson, T. Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
