Cases 61 - 70 of 316
Morton v. Davol Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00302
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Wanda Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morton v. Litteral et al
as 0:2019cv00066
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Paul Crouch, Kathy Litteral and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03421
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R. Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Morton v. Lawrence Whitley, et al
as 19-5701
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHRYN STRONG, Sumner County Clerk of Court, AMANDA MCCLENDON, Davidson County Circuit Court Judge, DEE GAY, Sumner County Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY L. MORTON
Timothy Morton v. Lawrence Whitley, et al
as 19-5720
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHRYN STRONG, Sumner County Clerk of Court, AMANDA MCCLENDON, Davidson County Circuit Court Judge, DEE GAY, Sumner County Circuit Court Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY L. MORTON
Morton v. Whitley et al
as 3:2019cv00395
Defendant:
Paul Walwyn, Dee Gay, John W. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. USA (TV2)
as 3:2019cv00203
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Morton Dean Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Modern Holdings, LLC, et al v Corning Incorporated, et al
as 5:2019cv00182
Plaintiff:
David Caldwell, Clyde Simpson, Steven Coffman and others
Defendant:
City of Danville Kentucky, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gregory v. Morton et al
as 1:2019cv01107
Defendant:
Joshua Morton and Dorothy Robertson
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Griffin v. John Coleman, et al
as 19-3451
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF JUDGE R. GUY COLE, JR., TOLEDO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION WARDEN OF SPECIAL SERVICES, GARY C. MOHR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT R. GRIFFIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
