Cases 81 - 90 of 736
Lane v. Haozhi et al
as 1:2022cv01485
Plaintiff:
John K. Lane
Defendant:
Yang Haozhi, Yang Liang, Ge Bing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Mekus v. Adams et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mekus
Defendant:
Mike Adams, Albert B. Chandler, III, Sherry Whitehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Myers v. Wren et al
as 1:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Lane Myers
Defendant:
Christopher Wren, Nicholas Smith and Unknown Freriks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Fontain v. Nestor et al
as 1:2022cv00431
Defendant:
Judge Terry Nestor, Harjinder Sandhu, Terrance Alysius Nestor and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Fontain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Renoir-Large et al
as 2:2022cv02920
Defendant:
Gabrielle Renoir-Large, Dana Delaney Matthews, Patricia Ann Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Norma D. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jackie Barnes, et al v. USA
as 22-5495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACKIE SUE BARNES, CHRISTOPHER W. BEAM, SANDRA A. BEAM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bean v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dale Bean
Defendant:
Lane Edward Williams and Progressive Casualty Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oiler v. Cleavenger et al
as 5:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Beth Oiler
Defendant:
Todd Cleavenger, Ohio Specialized Investments, LTD. and Fast Lane of Ohio, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santos v. Lane et al
as 3:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Fesnando F. Santos
Defendant:
Lieutenant f/n/u Lane and Sergeant f/n/u Coon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
