Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Janous v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Frank Donald Janous
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation a/k/a Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Maxey v. Cuyahoga County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Derrick S. Maxey
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Jail, Aramark Services and Trinity Services Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxey v. Cuyahoga County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01604
Plaintiff:
Derrick S. Maxey
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Jail, Aramark Services and Trinity Services Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dzinic et al v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10413
Plaintiff:
Sabina Dzinic and Adnan Dzinic
Defendant:
ARAMARK SERVICES INC., Dale Roe, Total Vending and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bybee v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bybee
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and New York Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Rice v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
LaTrecha Rice
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Saulsberry v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02239
Plaintiff:
Lillian Saulsberry
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaffer v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00858
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
