Cases 1 - 10 of 364
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Thornton
Defendant:
Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hollandsworth v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02404
Plaintiff:
Cecil Hollandsworth
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65349
Plaintiff:
Cecil Jones
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Shehorn et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01514
Plaintiff:
Lillian Shehorn and Cecil Shehorn
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Delgado et al
as 1:2024mc50151
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ricardo Delgado, II, Gregory Martin Hayes, Austin Antonio Saucedo and others
Petitioner:
Devica Thompson-Pratt
Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cecil Bennett
Defendant:
Commonwealth Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flenner v. Forshey
as 4:2023cv02292
Petitioner:
Cecil Lee Flenner
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett #200640 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Grand Prairie Wellpath, Margaret Ouellette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dykes-Bey v. Cecil et al
as 1:2023cv11998
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Dykes-Bey
Defendant:
Emily Cecil, Kelley Wellman, Mary Velarde and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
