Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Johnson et al v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Wendy Marie Johnson and James Arthur Johnson
Defendant:
Ethan Jones, Chase McKeown, Thomas Minter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Hershey Company
as 2:2022cv02869
Debtor:
James Arthur Marotti
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Garnishee:
Hershey Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Roat v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Roat
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Evans v. City of Pikeville et al
as 1:2019cv00238
Defendant:
City of Pikeville, TN, Bledsoe County Tennessee, Chase Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (PLR2)
as 3:2019cv00249
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff:
James Arthur
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Roat v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Roat
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stevens v. Anzalone et al
as 2:2018cv10619
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stevens
Defendant:
Anna Marie Anzalone and 39th Circuit Court
Webb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Webb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jenkins v. Beaumont Gross Pointe Medical Center et al
as 2:2012cv13798
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Jenkins
Defendant:
Beaumont Gross Pointe Medical Center, Nora Perkins and John Doe
Jenkins v. Beaumont Gross Pointe Medical Center et al
as 1:2012cv00848
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Jenkins
Defendant:
Beaumont Gross Pointe Medical Center, Nora Perkins and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
