Cases 1 - 10 of 1,323
Russell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Roy G Russell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roy Sutton, III v. Scott Wriggelsworth, et al
as 24-1483
Plaintiff:
ROY EUGENE SUTTON, III
Defendant:
SCOTT WRIGGELSWORTH, Sheriff, in official and personal capacity, JOHN DOE, Health Care Worker, in official and personal capacity and GLEN CIPULLO, Medical Doctor/Provider, in official and personal capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Strobl et al v. Croft et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Stacy Strobl and Brian Harding
Defendant:
Paul Croft, Jonathan Frost, Rhino Onward International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Couch et al v. Cox
as 0:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Roy Couch
Defendant:
Frank Cox and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Roy v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65429
Plaintiff:
Sarah E. Roy
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson Wesley v. Cuyahoga County, OH Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-3376
Plaintiff:
NELSON ROY WESLEY
Defendant:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CLIFFORD PINKNEY, CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH CORRECTIONS CENTER and others
Wright v. Richardson, et al.
as 2:2024cv11121
Defendant:
Deshon Anderson, Cedric Lamar Richardson, Dawn Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sutton v. Wriggelsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Roy Eugene Sutton, III
Defendant:
Scott Wriggelsworth, Unknown Party and Glen Cipullo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
