Cases 1 - 10 of 1,521
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-4099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Montague v. Schroeder
as 2:2024cv00213
Respondent:
Sarah Schroeder
Petitioner:
Alize Zachary Dwayne Montague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipari Foods Operating Company, LLC v. Eagle's Mark, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv13385
Defendant:
Joseph Hoff and Sarah Greene Hoff, Eagle's Mark, Inc., Joseph M Hoff and others
Plaintiff:
Lipari Foods Operating Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv13358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Green v. Shelby County Division of Correction et al
as 2:2024cv03001
Defendant:
Sarah Washington, Reece Walker, Tgichona Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valentine v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, Unknown Party #2 and Unknown Party #1
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Valentine #389916
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vaughn v. Rogers et al
as 5:2024cv00175
Defendant:
The City of Mayfield, Cody Rogers, Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rhonda Hehrer v. County of Clinton, MI, et al
as 24-2016
Defendant:
OFFICERS JANE DOES 1-2, LAWRENCE JERUE, Clinton County Sheriff, DAWN THELEN, Nurse and others
Plaintiff:
RHONDA HEHRER, Personal Representative of the estate of Joseph Hehrer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
