Cases 171 - 180 of 832,323
Jean-Rene v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Markis Jean-Rene
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Finnegan v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Defendant:
George P Sherman, Adrienne L Meiring and Indiana State of
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Thigpen et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Miller
Defendant:
Deputy Xavier Thigpen and Jones County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas v. Perez
as 3:2024cv03983
Plaintiff:
James Douglas
Defendant:
Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nunz v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Nunz
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Rigal, Quelyory v. U. S. Attorney General et al
as 0:2024cv61156
Plaintiff:
Quelyory A. Rigal and Quelyory Antonelly Rigal El
Defendant:
U. S. Attorney General, Riselda Ruiz, Albin Calixte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. County of Imperial et al
as 3:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
County of Imperial, City of Holtville, Justin Benavidez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Bain v. Vargas et al
as 0:2024cv61172
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bain
Defendant:
Jose Vargas and Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
