Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Rashun Singleton v. Amita Health, et al
as 19-1060
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON BURRIS, RONALD BRYSON, ANN MARIE CAULFIELD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RASHUN SINGLETON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avery Singleton v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 19-1036
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY C. RABIN, MELANIE WATSON-MONTGOMERY, FAUZIA KAHN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AVERY P. SINGLETON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Singleton et al v. Stateville Correctional Center (NRC) et al
as 1:2018cv05826
Plaintiff:
Perry C. Singleton
Defendant:
Illinois department of Correction and Stateville Correctional Center (NRC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yvonne Singleton v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 18-2711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YVONNE SINGLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, successor, Merger to BAC Home Loans LP doing business as COUNTRY WIDE HOME LOANS, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REDISTRATION SYSTEMS, U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Singleton v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00465
Petitioner:
Gary E Singleton
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kiel Stone v. Alex Bowman, et al
as 18-2247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIEL R. STONE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX C. BOWMAN, PAUL E. SINGLETON, ST. JOSEPH COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Stone v. Bowman et al
as 3:2018cv00348
Plaintiff:
Kiel Stone
Defendant:
Alex Christopher Bowman, Elizabeth A. Hardtke, Paul E Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. BOWMAN et al
as 1:2018cv01307
Defendant:
ALEX CHRISTOPHER BOWMAN, ELIZABETH A. HARDTKE, TIM MCLAUGHLIN and others
Plaintiff:
KIEL STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
