Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Olsson v. Malis et al
as 1:2022cv06575
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Defendant:
Richard Malis, Jeff Pharris, Daniel Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHARRIS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01197
Petitioner:
GLEN A. PHARRIS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Olsson v. Daniel Dyslin, et al
as 21-1294
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD MALIS, JEFF PHARRIS, DANIEL DYSLIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL OLSSON
Stevens v. Hardy et al
as 1:2020cv03285
Plaintiff:
Rachel Stevens
Defendant:
Tahseen Mohammed, Jeff Pharris, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Zubik et al
as 1:2020cv01701
Plaintiff:
Jon Johnson and Paul Olsson
Defendant:
Coleen Delaney, Jeff Pharris, Jeff Pilario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olsson v. Dyslin et al
as 1:2020cv00578
Defendant:
Tahseen Mohammed, Unknown OIG employees, The Office of the Inspector General and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nadzhafaliyev v. Dyslin et al
as 1:2019cv02590
Defendant:
Jeff Pharris, Daniel Dyslin, Richard Malis and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Nadzhafaliyev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHARRIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01207
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
RAFE PHARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SOUTHERN INDIANA TIRE INC. et al v. EADEN et al
as 3:2016cv00081
Defendant:
JOSHUA W. EADEN, J & J TIRE AND SERVICE LLC, JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN INDIANA TIRE INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stauffer v. Hayes et al
as 1:2011cv06355
Plaintiff:
John Stauffer
Defendant:
Karen E. Hayes, A Woman's Place of Fort Collins, P.L.L.P., Peter Dusbabek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
