Cases 41 - 50 of 241
Banks v. Hughes et al
as 4:2021cv03071
Defendant:
Security and Protection Services Inc. doing business as Lincoln Guards Security Company, Wells Fargo Bank and Nick Hughes
Plaintiff:
Janet Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Logan v. Sky Rise Real Estate Fund LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02063
Defendant:
Natasha R. Graf, Steve Hotz, Matthew W. Lindsey and others
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Dickinson v. First Midwest Bank
as 3:2020cv00085
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Dickinson
Defendant:
First Midwest Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. US Bank NA
as 4:2020cv00809
Plaintiff:
Ann Dunn
Defendant:
US Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Favors v. Aspire Bank
as 0:2020cv01893
Defendant:
Aspire Bank
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anthony Favors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helm v. Sons of Silence MC, The et al
as 2:2020cv01033
Defendant:
Scott Mcdermott, Courier, The, Kate Riley and others
Plaintiff:
True Vision Tattoos and Fine Arts LLC, Jacob Curtis Allen Helm and Green City Custom Tattoos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Parks et al
as 2:2020cv02142
Defendant:
Mercy Medical Center, Mr. Kelvin L Parks, VA Life Insurance-AAFMAA Military Life and others
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kraft v. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency et al
as 4:2020cv04111
Defendant:
Does 1-10, The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corp et al
as 2:2020cv02088
Defendant:
Wesley W. Von Schack, Thomas P. Gibbons, J. P. Sellers and others
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
