Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kalyn Aga, et al v. Meade County
as 22-3046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Meade County, a political subdivision of the State of South Dakota
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bhattacharya v. Southeast Missouri State University Board of Regents et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dr. Shamik Bhattacharya
Defendant:
Southeast Missouri State University Board of Regents, Dr. Carlos Vargas, Dr. Mike Godard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aga et al v. Meade County et al
as 5:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant:
Meade County, KNAUF KG a German Corporation and United States Gypsum Corporation, (USG Corporation) an Illinois Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad
O'Flaherty et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 4:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Stephen F. Sisolak, State of Nevada, Carlos Hank and others
Plaintiff:
Neal Patrick O'Flaherty and Dylan Keith O'Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Turn Key Health Clinics LLC
as 4:2021cv00112
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Absalom Tilley and Hannah Weatherly
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hall, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
