Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Aunhkhotep v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Aunhk Ra Aunhkhotep
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Police Officer Unknown Ebberhart, Police Captain Unknown Karnowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Evenstad v. Lynden et al
as 0:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Defendant:
Tom Lynden, A.J. Lague, Eric Chaleaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kalyn Aga, et al v. Meade County
as 22-3046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Meade County, a political subdivision of the State of South Dakota
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Aga et al v. Meade County et al
as 5:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant:
Meade County, KNAUF KG a German Corporation and United States Gypsum Corporation, (USG Corporation) an Illinois Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Chapman et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Defendant:
Marion Chapman and James Chapman
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Ernest W L Thompson
Defendant:
Ivory T McDaniel, S Chapman and Jermy Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
