Cases 101 - 110 of 940
Franklin v. Warr
as 2:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
Michael Locke Franklin
Defendant:
Sgt Warr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinsey v. Southeast Correctional Center
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Franklin Kinsey
Defendant:
Southeast Correctional Center, Unknown Effam, Unknown Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huntington National Bank v. DreamTeam Services Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv01281
Plaintiff:
Huntington National Bank
Defendant:
DreamTeam Services Inc. and Jennifer Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harco National Insurance Company v. JF Enterprises et al
as 4:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Harco National Insurance Company
Defendant:
JF Enterprises and Jeremy Franklin Mitsubishi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McAdams v. Kidd et al
as 6:2022cv06050
Plaintiff:
Joe B. McAdams
Defendant:
Brandon Franklin Kidd and Kidd Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1815
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
George Aldridge, Jr. v. Nina Hill
as 22-1793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
George Franklin Aldridge, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Nina Hill
United States v. Franklin Clark
as 22-1783
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Franklin Clark
Knight v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight and Phyllis M. Knight D.M.
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Judge Sheryl L. Lohaus, Darryl R. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Fikes
as 0:2022cv00646
Petitioner:
Warren Franklin
Respondent:
Warden J. Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
