Cases 121 - 130 of 193
Brooks v. Lawrence et al
as 4:2012cv00987
Plaintiff:
Malissa Brooks
Defendant:
Clyde E Lawrence and America First Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Clyde Robinson v. Dr. Karl Saffo, et al
as 12-2529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clyde Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Karl Saffo
Defendant:
Brenda Shira, Jean Ann Johnson, Farnham and others
Bryant v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Dale Bryant
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Obi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Eureka Fire Protection District et al
as 4:2012cv01051
Plaintiff:
Richard Clyde Adams , Wanda Marie Adams , Richard Michael Adams and others
Defendant:
Eureka Fire Protection District , Gregory Brown , Gregory Light and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reid v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv06071
Plaintiff:
Donnie Reid
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Wendy Kelley, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Clyde et al
as 6:2012cv06070
Plaintiff:
Mark R. Davis
Defendant:
Debra Clyde, Amy West, Teresia Farial and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyde Mittleider v. Dakota, MN & Eastern RR, et al
as 12-2174
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Clyde F. Mittleider
Defendant - Appellant:
Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad, Canadian Pacific Railway Company and Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd.
Nesbitt v. Villmer
as 4:2012cv00400
Petitioner:
Clyde J. Nesbitt, Jr.
Respondent:
Tom Villmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrish et al v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Parrish , Dana Akre , Addie Clyde and others
Defendant:
Mark Dayton and Josh Tilsen
Movant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
