Cases 11 - 20 of 27
McPeek v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 5:2018cv04005
Plaintiff:
Travis R McPeek
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency and Dave Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alberto Anguiano v. Iowa State Patrol, et al
as 15-1178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alberto Anguiano
Defendant - Appellee:
Iowa State Patrol and Drug Enforcement Agency
Philpott et al v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 2:2015cv02017
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Philpott
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Federal Bureau of Narcotics and All Arkansas Police Departments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anguiano v. Iowa State Patrol et al
as 4:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Alberto Anguiano
Defendant:
Iowa State Patrol and Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Drug Enforcement Agency
as 8:2013cv00275
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Odle v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 5:2013cv05059
Plaintiff:
Mark Odle
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Penning Co. Sherriffs Office, S.D. Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. High Intensity Drug Trafficing Administration et al
as 4:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Diaz
Defendant:
High Intensity Drug Trafficing Administration, Kansas City Missouri Drug Enforcement Agency, Kansas City Missouri Division of Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennell Robinson v. DEA, et al
as 09-3729
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Bennell Robinson
Defendant - Appellant:
Drug Enforcement Agency and Unknown Agent
Malagon-Avila v. USA et al
as 4:2009cv00562
Plaintiff:
Juan Malagon-Avila
Defendant:
USA and Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
