Cases 11 - 20 of 228
Travis Emory Correll v. The United States of America, et al
as 15-2188
Petitioner - Appellant:
Travis Emory Correll
Respondent - Appellee:
The United States of America, Eric Holder, Attorney General, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Perkins v. Jett et al
as 0:2015cv02140
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Perkins
Defendant:
B.R. Jett and Eric Holder, jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Ogan Bond v. Eric Holder, et al
as 15-1792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick O. Bond
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Holder, John Marti, Richard G. Callahan and others
Rosberg v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv04075
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg
Defendant:
United States of America, Eric Holder, Deborah R. Gilg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv03028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coy Phelps v. Eric H. Holder, et al
as 15-1286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Coy R. Phelps
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General, Charles Samuels, FBOP Chief Administrative Officer, Linda Sanders, Warden and others
Banks et al v. New York Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv03012
Defendant:
Ronnie Abrams, Jessica Albert, Harold Baer and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Kenneth Posner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Buckley v. Ray et al
as 5:2014cv00435
Plaintiff:
Gyronne Buckley
Defendant:
Keith Ray, Linda Card, Richard Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Turner v. DOJ, et al
as 14-3678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jane Turner
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Eric Holder, Attorney General and James M. Cole, Deputy Attorney General
Butler v. Bowers et al
as 4:2014cv01015
Defendant:
William L. Bowers and Eric Holder
Plaintiff:
David Butler
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
